The movement to oppose Keystone XL is huge in
Dave Coles,
President of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers’ Union, spoke to 5000
people on Oct. 23, 2012, at the Defend Our Coast rally in Victoria, British
Columbia, explaining why his members are “diametrically opposed” to Tar Sands
pipelines that would extend to BC’s coast.
A
representative of the United Fishermen and Allied Workers echoed those
concerns, citing the loss of fisheries jobs in Alaska following the Exxon Valdez oil
spill.
Most
recently, the December-January upsurge of popular solidarity with aboriginal
rights, voiced in part by the Idle No More movement, targeted federal
government legislation to eliminate federal protection of lakes and waterways.
Rallies held across the Canadian state also opposed pipeline construction to
transport Alberta crude to China and other destinations.
Opposition
to XL unites everyone to the left of the Stephen Harper Tories. Where the unity
fractures is over energy alternatives. Sadly, the labour-based New
Democratic Party federal leader Thomas Mulcair argues for building a pipeline
eastward to deliver the tarry fuel to Atlantic Canada, at a cost of billions,
rather than invest the money in green energy options—climate change be damned.
Protests in
Canada dovetail with actions against the construction of
oil pipelines in the United States . The most significant project is
the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry Alberta tar sands petroleum 1700 miles
through environmentally sensitive areas of the Midwest to refineries in Texas . In January, hundreds of Native
Americans, including supporters of Idle No More, gathered at the state capitol
in Lincoln , Nebraska , to oppose the line, pointing out
that it would endanger their ancestral lands.
On Jan. 26,
some 1400 marched in Portland , Maine , to protest a proposal to move tar
sands oil via a pipeline through eastern Canada to ports in New England .
And on Feb.
17, tar sands and the pipelines will be a major focus of the Forward on Climate
mass rally in Washington , D.C. The U.S. State Department is expected to release its
Environmental Impact Statement on the Keystone XL pipeline very soon, and the
Obama administration will make its decision on the project later this year.
According
to Oil Change International, emissions from tar sands extraction and upgrading
are between 3.2 and 4.5 times higher than the equivalent emissions from
production of conventional oil in North America . On a life cycle basis, the average
gallon of tar sands bitumen-derived fuel embodies between 14 and 37 percent
more greenhouse gas emissions than the average gallon of fuel from conventional
oil.
Reasons to
oppose pipelines and bitumen extraction do not stop there. Do you know the
story of petcoke? It’s a leftover from refining tar sands bitumen. Petcoke is
sold as coal, but since it is cheaper and dirtier, it helps keep coal-fired
plants running and polluting our atmosphere. A ton of petcoke yields, on
average, 53.6 percent more carbon dioxide than a ton of coal. The proven tar
sands reserves of Canada will yield roughly 5 billion tons
of petcoke—enough to fully fuel 111 U.S. coal plants to 2050.
The
situation is critical. That is why socialists say: No to tar sands
oil! No to the pipelines! Nationalize Big Oil under workers’ and community
control. To combat climate change, governments should radically reduce reliance
on fossil fuels, and implement a systematic plan for the development and use of
sustainable green energy alternatives.
> The article above is by Barry Weisleder, and is reprinted from Socialist Action newspaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment