On
the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution, many people are
rereading the history of the revolution that brought forth the very
first worker’s state in history. Since 1991, however, the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics no longer exists. The former USSR has
splintered into 15 independent capitalist states. The Russian
Federation is now the largest capitalist country in the world in
area, occupying one-seventh of the earth’s surface, with a
population in January 2017 of 146,428,420.
While
Russia and President Vladimir Putin have been continually in the U.S.
news media since Trump won the White House, there is very little
information about working-class struggles throughout the Russian
Federation today. The left should not be caught up in the
Democrats’ excuses for their loss of the election or the
Republicans’ fear of Trump’s relationship with Russian oligarchs.
We must not ignore the struggles of the working classes of the
Russian Federation and the former Soviet republics, which deserve our
solidarity.
In
the U.S. the top 10 percent of the population earns about 47% of the
total income. In Russia, similarly, the top 10 percent income share
is 45% of the total, while they control a staggering 86% of the
country’s wealth. “Russia and the U.S. are probably the two most
unequal countries in the world,” according to Gabriel Zucman,
economist at the University of California at Berkeley and author of a
recent study on the subject. “Those are the two leaders when it
comes to extreme income and wealth inequality.”
Zucman
points out that the Soviet government was able to drastically reduce
income inequality. The top 1 percent’s share of income fell
from 18 percent in 1905 to 4 percent after 1922.
Now,
however, President Vladimir Putin has become one of the world’s
richest men, as control over natural resources has been transferred
from public lands to government loyalists, giving a small group of
oligarchs control over gas, oil, and timber—the major sector’s of
the Russian economy. Zucman’s study shows that offshore wealth is
about 75 percent of the national income of Russia. The privatization
has been called by some “controlled looting.”
Unions
are attacked
The
massive income inequality means that a great many Russian workers
struggle to survive. Observers estimate that half their income is
spent on food. But there have been few strikes, as workers in Russia
experience increasing repression.
Mark
Galeotti, with the Institute of International Relations in Prague,
recalls that a member of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB)
told a reporter, “My job is to make sure that no Lech Walesa
emerges in my oblast (province).” This was a reference to the
Polish worker (and later politician) who led protests and strikes
against the government in 1970 at the Gdansk Shipyard in Poland.
Strikes
in Russia are generally very short wildcat actions. Most trade unions
are state controlled, and independent unions are the target of
attacks.
A
short but widespread series of wildcat strikes took place in April
2015, mainly to protest cutbacks and unpaid back wages. Teachers and
construction workers in Siberia, metal workers in the Ural Mountains
region, and autoworkers in St. Petersburg took part. In response to
the pressure, Putin personally intervened to see that the workers got
paid. Since then, strikes have been sporadic. Hundreds of
construction workers, for example, have staged strikes in recent
months to protest abusive working conditions at work sites for the
2018 World Cup.
Repression
against the labor movement is also widespread in other countries that
formerly were part of the USSR. In Belarus, in August, there was a
major attack on the Independent Union of the Radio-Electronics
industry (IURI) and the Confederation of Independent Trade Unions of
the Republic (CTUB). Police broke into their offices and removed
computers. They arrested Gennadii Fedynich, the president of IURI,
and Alexander Yaroshyuk, head of CTUB.
These
trade unions led large protests earlier in the year against the “Tax
on Parasites” after the government had announced a new tax on the
poor and the unemployed. Several thousand protesters marched on
Minsk, and riot police and water cannons were deployed. Anyone with a
sign was subject to being arrested, and when relatives showed up to
demand their release, they were arrested as well.
In
Kazakhstan, attacks on unions escalated this year against over 400
trade-union organizations. In August, Larisa Kharkova, head of the
Confederation of Independent Trade Unions of Kazakhstan, was
sentenced to a four-year suspended sentence, a five-year ban on trade
union activities and 100 hours of public work. Her crime officially
was “misuse of power,” but the trial was actually for her public
support for a hunger strike of 700 oil workers in Mangystau in
January. In May, the leader of the oil workers’ protest, Amina
Yeleusinova, was sentenced to two years in prison. LabourStart has
launched an international campaign demanding an end to anti-union
repression in Belarus and Kazakhstan.
“Anti-Corruption
Marches” throughout Russia
The
Committee for a Workers’ International (CWI) reported from Russia
that illegal mass protests, called Anti-Corruption Marches, took
place in March in around 100 cities that started in the far east in
Vladivostok and moved across Russia, including 6000 in cities in
Siberia and 2000 in the Volga region. Protesters showed up in small
cities where they were not expected in the north, and there were even
protests in Simferopol and Sevastepol, Crimea’s two major cities.
The
largest actions were in St. Petersburg, where 15,000 poured into the
Winter Palace courtyard and then marched down the Nevskii Prospect.
Police reports showed that 130 were arrested. In Moscow 15,000 filled
Tverskoi Prospect and marched towards the Kremlin; over 1000
were arrested. This included reporters and photographers, including
Alec Luhn, a British Guardian reporter.
Luhn reported that 136 of the 800 detained were under 18 years old.
Five
years ago, the Anti-Corruption Marches were first called by
opposition leader Alexei Navalny, and centered only in Moscow. The
issues of the march this year went beyond anti-corruption to
demanding a national minimum wage and issues like education and
health care. While Navalny is described as a pro-capitalist
neoliberal, he has been attacked by other opposition neoliberal
groups for including issues of workers’ rights. Now that the
demonstrations have expanded outside Moscow, Navalny says that he
will be making direct appeals to the working class with further
economic demands.
The
election will be next year. The leader of Crimea stated that the best
thing for Russia would be a tsar. He quickly corrected himself and
said that Putin would be the “best tsar.”
Recent
reports are that the Kremlin will not allow Navalny to be a candidate
in the election. He clearly is not a working-class leader, but the
growing turnout for mass action throughout the whole country is an
encouraging development within Russia, where the most common protest
that is sometimes allowed is what is a called a single person picket.
>> The article above was written by Ann Montague, and is reprinted from Socialist Action.
No comments:
Post a Comment