At
the time of this writing, Hurricane Nate is plowing through the
eastern United States, the 14th named storm of what is on track
to be the most costly Atlantic hurricane season on record. Over the
summer, wildfires scorched millions of acres across the western U.S.
and Canada, darkening the skies with smoke from the Pacific Coast to
as far east as upstate New York. This year’s monsoon season has
seen unprecedented flooding in Asia, killing more than 1200 people
and displacing over 40 million from their homes.
Are
these disasters natural, or do they point to the threats posed by
late capitalism to society and to the very Earth itself?
If
one refuses to accept such disasters as random “acts of God” and
admits that such disasters are growing more frequent and severe and
impacting more people, then it is important to understand the
dynamics at work and how socialists should respond. These disasters
are united by at least two trends: the heating of the atmosphere by
greenhouse gases from the extraction and burning of fossil fuels, and
the failure of the capitalist state to adequately plan for
foreseeable disasters or address human needs in their aftermath.
The
existence of human-caused climate change is now beyond dispute even
by some of the most ardent backers of oil, gas, and coal extraction.
The Trump administration’s muzzling of the EPA and other federal
agencies cannot change the facts—the world is on track for the
worst-case climate scenario envisioned by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, one that would warm the planet 4-8 degrees Celsius
by the end of the century.
Even
the two-degree rise targeted by the toothless Paris Climate Accord
would spell displacement for millions in low-lying coastal areas. At
six degrees, climate models tell us, large areas of the planet would
become uninhabitable due to roasting temperatures alone, never mind
storms, fires, diseases, famine, or sea-level rise.
The
physics behind global warming’s impact on extreme weather is
straightforward. A warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor, which
causes more evaporation. Warmer oceans contribute to that
evaporation. Greater evaporation rates dry out the land faster,
contributing to droughts if the dominant weather patterns move
moisture elsewhere.
The
water vapor in the atmosphere holds energy; when it condenses into
liquid water, it releases that energy, causing storms. The more water
vapor condenses, the more energy there is, and the stronger the
storms. The result is a cycle of drought and deluge. Some areas
experience more frequent and extreme droughts than historically,
while others get more frequent and extreme deluge.
Drought
in the West; flooding in the East
In
the U.S. West, drought is being called the “new normal” by
scientists. After five years of intense drought, the snowpack of the
Sierra Nevada last winter was one of the biggest on record—causing
flooding as it melted. But farther north, drought lingered and
intensified, causing one of the most active fire seasons on record.
Overall, the Western fire season has lengthened by two and a half
months since 1970 due to global warming, with twice the number of
acres burned per year as would be expected without it.
Over
10 million acres—an area almost three times the size of
Connecticut—burned across the U.S. Northwest and British Columbia
this summer. Portland, Ore., residents were shrouded in
asthma-inducing smoke from the fires for weeks on end. Health
officials told people to stay indoors whenever possible. At one
point, satellite photos showed fire smoke wreathing the northern U.S.
all the way to Niagara Falls.
If
the fires out West are the drought side, the Gulf Coast provides the
counterpoint. Hurricane Harvey was the third “500-year flood”
event that Houston saw in three years (i.e., the statistical
probability of even one of these floods occurring any given year is
about 1 in 500). After 40+ inches of rain, places well outside of
floodplains shown on federal flood insurance maps were inundated.
But
global warming was not the only environmental culprit of Houston’s
flooding. The city is built on bottomland with a 2000-mile network of
natural bayous. Native prairie grasses with roots that burrow a dozen
feet into the sod can soak up tremendous quantities of rainwater. But
the city’s explosive growth has paved over much of the prairie land
with impervious buildings and concrete, while local officials have
simply refused to limit the profits of developers with zoning
regulations.
Instead,
driven by the irrational logic of capitalist development, the city’s
engineers have buried their heads in the sand. A recent piece by The
Texas Tribune and
ProPublica quotes flood-control officials as calling the
conservation-oriented conclusions of their agency’s own
flood-management research “absurd” and dismissing climate
science.
Then
there was the response to the hurricane—or lack thereof. Harvey
made landfall as a Category 4 storm, the same intensity as Hurricane
Katrina when it devastated New Orleans in 2005. But preparations were
haphazard at best. While the state issued mandatory evacuations for
several coastal counties, Houston city officials explicitly told
residents to stay in the city—largely because they feared huge
traffic jams with cars trapped and inundated as waters rose.
Requisitioning buses and trains to speed evacuations and include
those without private vehicles was simply not considered as an
option.
Residents
who have returned to the highly industrialized Texas Gulf Coast face
cleaning up a toxic mess from flooded oil refineries. In Port Arthur,
many of the town’s 15 toxic waste Superfund sites flooded,
spreading carcinogenic chemicals around. A fuel storage tank in a
Black neighborhood exploded, releasing a million pounds of toxic
emissions into the air. Environmental justice activist Hilton Kelley
told “Democracy Now!” that neither the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) nor the Red Cross were responding to
residents’ pleas for help, and many renters who evacuated were
evicted by their landlords.
Puerto
Rico: Imperialist policies worsen storm damage
But
the damage and displacement in Texas pales in comparison to Puerto
Rico. Hurricane Maria knocked out electricity and water treatment
across the entire island. These services are unlikely to be restored
for months—not just due to the storm, but also to the cataclysm of
financialization and neoliberalism that have destroyed the island’s
infrastructure over the past three decades.
Financialization—described
thoroughly by Lenin in “Imperialism: The Highest Stage of
Capitalism”—is a result of the monopoly-building of corporate
capital. Capitalists must increasingly invest in financial capital,
i.e., interest-bearing bank assets, instead of real infrastructure to
see a return on their investments. Writes Lenin: “Finance capital,
concentrated in a few hands and exercising a virtual monopoly, exacts
enormous and ever-increasing profits from the floating of companies,
issue of stock, state loans, etc., strengthens the domination of the
financial oligarchy and levies tribute upon the whole of society for
the benefit of monopolists.”
This
tribute is exactly what has been extracted from Puerto Rico before
and during its ongoing debt crisis. The June 2016 Act of Congress
relegating the U.S. island territory back to pure colonial status was
named PROMESA, Spanish for “promise.” The promise was to reorient
the territory’s budget toward paying the hedge fund and mutual fund
investors who own its massive debt.
Signed
into law by President Obama, the act created an unelected
seven-member “fiscal control board” (non-ironically nicknamed the
junta)
to seize the island’s finances, effectively voiding the territory’s
constitution. Draconian cuts to health care, pensions, and education
followed. Even before the latest round of austerity, the territorial
government was spending more on debt service than any of these human
services.
The
failed PR spectacle of U.S. President Donald Trump throwing paper
towels to onlookers in one of the least-damaged parts of the island
made a mockery of the real human needs of residents, most of whom
still lack food, fuel, or clean drinking water weeks after the
hurricane. Meanwhile, more than 10,000 shipping containers filled
with food and supplies sat untouched in the Port of San Juan for over
a week, the victim of a disorganized and underfunded disaster
response effort.
The
island’s electrical infrastructure is in shambles. The electrical
utility, PREPA, was chronically underfunded before the hurricane and
racked up billions of dollars’ worth of deferred maintenance. Even
Trump admitted that rebuilding the island’s infrastructure to meet
human needs will require forgiving the debt—comments which other
Trump administration officials have already backpedaled on.
While
the U.S. preparation and response to this season’s hurricanes has
been dismal, Hurricane Irma’s impact on Cuba provides a major
contrast. That storm hit Cuba as a Category 5 hurricane and did
extreme damage to the island’s central and western provinces,
causing major flooding in Havana. It garnered the highest death toll
of any storm since 2005: 10. The low number is a testament to Cuba’s
comprehensive disaster preparation and response system, one that’s
admired as the best in the world.
Cuba
has a state-of-the-art storm tracking system that allows the country
to issue weather alerts 72 hours before landfall. The National Civil
Defense agency inspects and stocks shelters and coordinates
evacuations. Television and radio broadcast instructions.
Neighborhood-level Committees for the Defense of the Revolution go
door-to-door checking on or evacuating pregnant women, the elderly,
and the infirm.
If
beleaguered Cuba can take care of everyone’s needs during disaster,
the wealthiest nation on Earth also should be able to. Working people
in the United States must demand more from the government, starting
with a nationwide organized effort to anticipate and plan for more
frequent future storms and fires. FEMA should be reorganized and
given a huge boost in funding along with new protocols along the
lines of the Cuban model.
Puerto
Rico’s debt must be forgiven now! Infrastructure in Puerto Rico
must be rebuilt by the government under democratic control, funded by
the federal government through higher taxes on corporations and the
wealthy. At the same time, Puerto Rico must be granted
self-determination to forge its own economic and political future.
The
U.S. government and all states must mobilize a Marshall Plan-like
just transition to renewable energy—particularly wind and
solar—hiring displaced workers at union wages. Ultimately, the way
to address growing climate catastrophe is by replacing the system
that created the crisis with a socialist system that puts people and
the planet first.
>> The article above was written by Carl Sack, and is reprinted from Socialist Action.
1 comment:
Poor Carl Sack. So lost and confused.
Thankfully he will never have kid.
Post a Comment