Trump’s views on immigrants are
well known. Over the past year and some months that he has been
president, Trump has attempted to bully Congress into enacting ever
more draconian measures targeting undocumented immigrants residing in
the U.S. He has threatened to build a wall and make Mexico pay for
it. He has threatened to beef up the Border Patrol and other security
measures at the U.S.-Mexico border. He has threatened to renegotiate
the NAFTA trade deal. He has called Mexican immigrants dangerous drug
dealers and rapists.
Although many of Trump’s threats
have yet to be implemented, many changes in the immigration
enforcement system have been enacted. But are these changes initiated
by Trump the result of the racist policies of one man, or are they a
deeper symptom of the capitalist economic system we live under?
The Trump administration recently
announced that it would be ending the TPS, or Temporary Protective
Status program for 200,000 Salvadoran immigrants, 45,000 Haitian
immigrants, and 90,000 Honduran immigrants. Other groups—such as
immigrants from Nicaragua, Nepal, and Sudan—have already lost their
status. In fact, due to the changes initiated by Trump, 98% of the
317,000 TPS holders in the U.S. have now lost their protective
status.
The TPS program was created in 1990
to provide legal protections for immigrants coming from countries
devastated by natural disasters like hurricanes or armed conflicts
and violence. It provides immigrants from the designated countries
with legal status and authorization to work in the U.S. Many of the
recipients in the program have now lived in the United States for
decades and have built a life here. They have jobs, pay taxes, own
homes, and have children who were born in the U.S. They send money to
support their relatives back home—money that the economies of their
countries of origin depend on. According to The
New York Times, in 2016,
17% of the economy of El Salvador was built on remittances.
Similarly, CNN reports that in 2017 remittances made up 19% of the
GDP of Honduras. Removing that flow of income would be devastating to
those countries and the people who live there.
Despite the fact that many of these
countries continue to experience ongoing violence, economic
devastation, and a serious lack of infrastructure, the Trump
administration is basing its decisions to end TPS programs on whether
the original conditions for the TPS designation, such as the
earthquakes in El Salvador in 2001, still exist. But the programs
were originally created to protect immigrants and refugees whose
countries did not have the resources to reabsorb them, and many of
them still don’t have the ability to do so.
The recipients whose TPS status has
been terminated must now face devastating choices. Most of them are
given an 18-month timeline to leave the U.S. If they choose to stay,
they will lose their jobs and join the ranks of the 11 million
undocumented immigrants who face deportation every day in order to
put food on the table for their families. Originally quoted in The
New York Times, Veronica
Lagunas, a 39-year-old Salvadoran woman with two U.S.-born children,
said that she would rather stay in the United States illegally,
losing her job and benefits and risking deportation, rather than
return to her home country. She said, “There is nothing to go back
to in El Salvador. The infrastructure may be better now, but the
country is in no condition to receive us.”
An end to DACA?
Similarly, Trump has also moved to
end the DACA program, which protected 800,000 immigrants brought to
the U.S. without papers when they were children. Although the program
was only a temporary stop-gap solution, it gave young immigrants,
often known as Dreamers, an opportunity to live, work, and go to
school in the U.S. without constantly looking over their shoulders.
After being in effect for five years, Trump announced in September
2017 that he would begin phasing out the program in March 2018 unless
Congress passed a replacement, a move that has failed to happen.
In a press announcement issued with
Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Trump stated that he was motivated by
a concern for “the millions of Americans victimized by this unfair
system.” Sessions added that the DACA program had “denied jobs to
hundreds of thousands of Americans by allowing those same illegal
aliens to take those jobs.” Some critics of the DACA program have
also contended that it has only encouraged more immigrants to come to
the U.S. seeking protections. They have claimed that these children
went on to become members of violent gangs in the U.S.
In 2014, there was a surge of
immigration across the U.S. Mexico border. Many of the tens of
thousand of immigrants who arrived during this wave were in fact
children from Central American countries who were fleeing gang
violence in their home countries. The fact is that the vast majority
of people who come to the U.S. are fleeing economic devastation,
wars, and climate disasters that the United States played a direct
role in causing.
Four years later, it has come to
light that 1500 children who crossed the border into the U.S. from
Central American countries like Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador
are simply missing. These were vulnerable children who were fleeing
drug cartels, gang violence and domestic abuse in their home
countries and were taken into government care when they arrived at
the border alone. They were then placed with sponsors who were
supposed to care for them and make sure they attended school while
waiting for their immigration hearings. Government workers were
supposed to check in with the sponsors over the phone to ensure the
children’s needs were being met, but the Department of Health and
Human Services (DHHS) recently found that they were unable to account
for the whereabouts of 1475 children in the program.
This has raised concerns that the
children may have fallen into the hands of human traffickers.
According to The New
York Times, in 2016 Health
and Human Services officials placed eight children with human
traffickers who forced the children to work on an egg farm in Marion,
Ohio. As a result, Homeland Security and the DHHS signed a memorandum
of agreement to put new guidelines in place to prevent similar
episodes from occurring in the future. But two years later, these
guidelines have still not been implemented.
In early May, the Trump
Administration announced that it would enact a policy of “100%
prosecution” at the border, meaning that they would refer anyone
caught crossing the border without papers for federal prosecution.
This new policy will effectively separate parents from their children
at the border, because children are not allowed to accompany adults
who are taken into federal custody. In April of this year, Trump
announced the “extraordinary” measure of deploying the National
Guard to the border to protect national security and support the
Border Patrol agents already working there. But this measure wasn’t
extraordinary at all. In fact, thousands of National Guard troops
were also deployed to the U.S.-Mexico border by President George W.
Bush and even President Obama himself, the “deporter in chief.”
Meanwhile, families continue to be
ripped apart on a daily basis by an escalation in raids and
deportations. As of May 31, more than 10,800 migrant children are
being held in federal custody, according to the Department of Health
and Human Services—up 21 percent from a month earlier.
ICE raids on the rise
Although the wave of ICE raids has
been nationwide, one area that has been particularly hard-hit has
been Philadelphia. It was recently reported by The
Philadelphia Inquirer that
ICE agents rounded up 49 undocumented immigrants there in a raid that
lasted seven days.
ICE claims that it targeted “dangerous
criminals,” people who had been previously deported, or those
released on an ICE detainers. Detainers are issued to local
authorities (such as county jails) when ICE asks them to hold
immigrants booked on other charges (or sometimes people who haven’t
been charged with anycrime
at all) until ICE can come and pick them up. That is a common way
that undocumented immigrants who are booked into jail on minor
charges, such as traffic violations, end up in deportation
proceedings.
The Inquirer reported
that that city and federal governments are now battling in court over
whether Philadelphia, which is a “sanctuary city,” must honor
detainers issued by ICE. And battles like this one are being waged in
cities, large and small, across the U.S. The truth is that despite
Trump’s recent crackdown on undocumented immigrants, the U.S.
economy depends on the cheap and easily exploitable labor of the many
immigrants, undocumented or living with precarious immigration
status, who make up the fabric of our communities.
The immigration system isn’t
broken. It is working exactly as it was intended to, and policies
like the ones Trump promotes are designed to keep immigrants afraid
while keeping their potential allies in the U.S. working class
alienated from their struggle. Hence the constant claims that
immigrants are out to steal U.S. jobs and the xenophobia common in
corporate media.
Throughout U.S. history, there has
always been a scapegoat immigrant class. From the Chinese who built
the railroads crisscrossing the U.S. landscape, to the Eastern
Europeans who worked in the Chicago packing houses in Upton
Sinclair’s classic book “The Jungle,” although the countries of
origins and skin colors of immigrants coming to the U.S. have changed
over the years, the virulent attacks against immigrants have remained
the same.
But that doesn’t mean that
immigrants and their allies today are taking all the attacks that
Trump has leveled against them without a fight. Many of Trump’s
immigration policy changes have sparked heated debate and protests in
the streets. On May 1, thousands of people marched in the streets in
modest demonstrations across the U.S. for International Worker’s
Day and in support of immigrants’ rights.
In Minneapolis, the Immigrant
Movement for Justice recently organized a panel discussion on the TPS
issue. J. Rivas from Immigrant Movement for Justice said, “It is
time to raise our voices and fight together for our brothers and
sisters who are part of this country because their family should be
considered part of this country too. Together we will create
resistance to the injustices of incarceration and deportation that
our communities are facing.
“We stand with those who
immigrated to the U.S. Those with Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrival (DACA) status. Those with Temporary Protected Status (TPS).
Those who have Deferred Enforced Departure (DED). Those who have
received political asylum. Those who came here as refugees.
“The Immigrant Movement for
Justice stands together, and we will continue to defend the rights of
all people, including those who don’t have legal status and are
fighting for amnesty to stay and live here without fear of one day
being deported and torn from their family and community. Let’s
build a movement!” It remains to be seen what the spark will be
that will set that movement afire.
>> The article above was written by Lisa Luinenburg, and is reprinted from Socialist Action.
No comments:
Post a Comment