Since
April, hundreds of thousands of Nicaraguans have taken to the streets
in protest of the policies of the government led by FSLN President
Daniel Ortega. The protests at one point escalated to road blocks and
occupations and have been fiercely resisted by the government.
Undoubtedly, Nicaraguan society is in crisis. Here, we present some
important background information as to its origins.]
It
is clear the working class is not in the leadership of the opposition
forces currently carrying out a “national dialogue” with the
government. A mis-leadership composed of the business group COSEP and
the Catholic Church seems to be in the driver’s seat in these
meetings. Additionally, the United States and other imperialist
powers are intervening via the Organization of American States and
wooing student groups to demand new elections without any regard for
Nicaragua’s sovereignty.
Given
the number of reactionary players attempting to shape Nicaragua’s
future, it is important to understand how students, the working
class, and small business people came to be ready to take to the
streets when the regime proposed to implement International Monetary
Fund recommendations to cut pensions.
Since
the 2006 election of Daniel Ortega to the presidency, there has been
what the Latin American Studies scholar William I. Robinson called an
“intensification of capitalist development.” The Nicaraguan
government, encouraged by the International Monetary Fund, has
facilitated a dramatic growth in imperialist investment in Free Trade
Zones, infrastructure, agribusiness, and mining. At the same time,
according the Christian Science Monitor (Nov. 7, 2011),
large contributions from Venezuela were used to bolster private
companies tied to key figures in the ruling FSLN party.
The
resulting lop-sided economic growth, not unsurprisingly, has led to a
series of ecological crises that are threatening peasants and
indigenous peoples, and to new inequalities that must be faced by
workers, small businesses, and the people making a living in the
informal sector. Significant layers of the Nicaraguan population have
responded to these indignities over the last decade with protests.
In
2014, discontent with the state of affairs was threatening enough to
the ruling FSLN that it fought and won legislation to overturn the
term limits that would have prevented Ortega from running again for
office. In 2016, FSLN power was used to press the Supreme Court to
disqualify Ortega’s main opponent from the election altogether,
bringing civil libertarians into the forefront of the social
movement.
One
of the most graphic responses to the FSLN electoral manipulation was
a demonstration of 10,000 indigenous people who supported the Yatama
party in Puerto Cabezas-Bilwi. Yatama has been protesting the FSLN’s
failure to rein in a massive settler movement that is grabbing land
in the autonomous zones where the Miskitu people hold communal
property rights. Over half of the Miskitia rainforest region has
already been taken by colonists seeking timber, gold, and land for
cattle-raising, and the FSLN has not acted.
In
April, these settler incursions onto indigenous land resulted in the
infamous fire in the Indio Maíz Biodiversity Reserve, a fire that
destroyed 6300 hectares or 15,567 acres of protected land. The
Nicaraguan government’s initial refusal to accept international
firefighting help was one of the sparks that ignited the April
protest movement, as the catastrophe was such a dramatic example of
the “profits before people” ethos of the new Sandinista economic
plan for the nation.
The
outrage over the Indio Maíz fire was prepared by years of indigenous
and rural protests against a concession signed by the regime with the
Hong Kong-based HKND Company for a massive and hugely destructive
shipping canal that would bisect the country, break up the
Mesoamerican biological corridor, and cut through four nature
reserves, a globally important wetland, and Central America’s
largest body of freshwater. The scale of the proposed digging and
accompanying land expropriation is hard to grasp. The canal has been
slated to be 65 miles long, occupy 500 square miles, and displace at
least 7000 people.
In
the years since the canal project was announced, rural Nicaraguans
and indigenous groups have carried out at least 90 protests (Havana
Times, April 28, 2018). In the last year, news accounts have begun to
report that the canal itself may be dead in the water due to lack of
investment and a new deal between Panama and Beijing. But no one in
the movement is relieved, as the legislation that was signed for the
canal project, Law 840, allows subsidiary development of deepwater
ports, roads, and tourist areas under the same
sovereignty-threatening and people-displacing rules. The FSLN has
announced that it is going forward, for example, with a deepwater
port in the heart of indigenous territory, just north of the Indio
Maíz Biodiversity Reserve, at Bluefields (Rico, Today
Nicaragua, Feb. 15, 2018).
The
government’s facilitation of big investment by foreign mining
companies has led to a new protest movement as well. In Nicaragua,
there is no greater symbol of imperialist perfidy than a gold mine.
In 1926, the Nicaraguan hero Augusto Sandino famously began his
guerrilla war against the Yankees by occupying the San Albino gold
mine and using the funds from production to buy weapons for his army,
a combat unit that was initially composed of 30 gold miners. After
four months of lucrative extraction, he blew up the mine, making it a
symbol of international capitalist exploitation (Sandra Cuffe,
“Nicaragua’s Golden Rule”).
In
2015, the residents of the agricultural town of Rancho Grande in the
department of Matagalpa, part of the buffer zone of the Bosawás
Biosphere Reserve, won a years-long struggle to stop the Canadian
company B2Gold’s “El Pavón” open-pit gold-mining project
there. The Yaoksa Guardians community environmental defense movement
not only repeatedly demonstrated despite police violence, but
organized a civil resistance campaign against the state that included
a boycott of the schools and keeping their children home until the
Minister of Education showed up to experience their protests.
The
Rancho Grande victory was one high point in a grinding battle now
mobilizing regional anti-mining groups from the Chontales, León, and
Nueva Segovia departments, united under the banner of a new
organization called the National Environmental Movement Against
Industrial Mining (MONAFMI). One of the anticipated fights will focus
on a proposed new mine in the historic San Albino district, which is
to be operated by the Canadian Golden Reign Resources.
In
August 2017, Ortega issued executive decree 15-2017, which repeals
the country’s historic Environmental Evaluation System and allows
environmental review of mines to be bypassed all together by a decree
of the Ministry of the Environment. At the same time, the people of
Santa Cruz de la India were in the streets contending with riot
police in order to protest an attempt to start a mining project,
backed by the World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation
(IFC), to be run by the UK-based Condor Gold. Civil resistance
prevented actual digging for nearly a year but in July, the company
submitted a revised permit plan to Managua, which is expected to be
approved.
Condor
Gold expects to produce 80,000 ounces of gold a year from this one
pit. Its expectations are in line with the ecologically damaging and
demographically disruptive national output of gold and silver, which
has grown seven times since the 2007 election of Ortega (Cecelia
Jasmine, mining.com, July 6, 2018). It is easy to see why a large
layer of the Nicaraguan population feels that it is time to take down
Nicaragua’s “open for business” sign.
One
of the greatest indignities for working-class Nicaraguans has been
the drastic expansion of Free Trade Zones. In 2010, Free Trade Zones
in Nicaragua accounted for 90% of manufacturing exports from the
country (Nathalie Picarelli, “Who Really Benefits from Export
Processing Zones?” August 2016). In 2017, the National Commission
of Free Zones approved the entry of new companies in the sectors of
tobacco, textiles, and agro-industry. There are now 115,000 workers
in Nicaragua being exploited by industrialists who have been given a
90% tax exemption for 10 years and pay their laborers an average of
$157 per month, an amount that only comes to 33% of what the
government estimates is necessary for a minimum existence.
Investors
are not hard to come by, as the maquiladora wage in Nicaragua is the
lowest in Central America. However, the bravery of workers demanding
drinking water, health care, and lower production goals became
international news when a 2016 protest of 3000 workers at the South
Korean company Tecnotex in Tipitapa was stormed by government riot
police, and organizers were charged and found guilty of crimes with
prison sentences. Tecnotex produces garments for export to companies
in the United States, including Kohls, Target, JC Penney, and
Walmart.
>> The article above was written by Christine Marie, and is reprinted from Socialist Action.
No comments:
Post a Comment