Not
surprisingly, the IPCC’s special report on global warming of up to
1.5°C confirms that the impacts of anthropogenic climate change are
formidable and have been underestimated, both socially and
environmentally.
The
1°C warming we are already experiencing is enough to cause major
tragedies: unprecedented heat waves, hurricanes, flooding, glacier
and ice-cap dislocation. These give an idea of what awaits us if
human warming is not stopped as soon as possible. Disaster is no
longer preventable, but it is still possible and necessary to limit
it as much as possible.
The
report leaves no doubt: a warming of 2°C would have much more
serious consequences than the 1.5°C warming included in the Paris
Agreement (under pressure from small island states, the least
developed countries, scientists and the climate movement). According
to recent research, the threshold of a “hothouse planet” could
even been triggered at 2°C. Every effort must be made to ensure that
this limit of 1.5°C maximum is respected.
The
IPCC report estimates that this will be extremely challenging, if not
impossible, even with the massive use of "negative emission
technologies" (TENs) and geoengineering. [1]
The report therefore refers to a scenario of “temporary overshoot”,
compensated by a cooling in the second half of the century, thanks to
these technologies.
This
scenario is very dangerous. Indeed, the situation is so serious that
the temporary overshoot could be sufficient to cause large-scale,
non-linear and irreversible shifts, such as the sudden break-up of
large parts of the ice caps of Greenland and Antarctica, resulting in
a rise of several metres in sea level. These shifts could unlock a
cascade of feedbacks pushing the system Earth in a runaway climate
change. In addition, these sorcerer’s apprentice technologies under
consideration are hypothetical and their effects, could be very
negative.
“Every
tonne of CO2 not emitted counts,” the scientists say. Every tonne
counts, indeed. Saving the climate requires that all fossil fuel use
be stopped as soon as possible and completely. Why then do experts
not count emissions from the production and consumption of useless or
harmful things - such as weapons - or ridiculous international
transport of goods that only serve to maximize the profits of
multinationals?
As
an immediate measure to reduce the emissions from international
transport there should be an ever-increasing tax on fossil fuel used
by international shipping and transportation. The tax revenue should
be redistributed to the Global South via the Green Climate Fund.
Fundamentally,
a strategy seriously aiming at not exceeding 1.5°C requires
eliminating unnecessary or harmful production as a priority and
abandoning agribusiness in favour of local agro-ecology (which can
fix huge amounts of carbon while providing good food to everybody).
But this means breaking with the capitalist law of profit. The
problem is this law is at the very heart the scenarios of societal
evolution that serve as the basis for the projections. The IPCC’s
fifth report states it in black and white: “The models assume fully
functioning markets and competitive market behaviour.”
The
IPCC’s expertise is essential when it comes to assessing the
physical phenomenon of climate change. On the other hand, its
stabilization strategies are biased by the submission of research to
the capitalist imperatives of growth and profit. The scenario of a
temporary overshoot of 1.5°C with nuclear power maintained and
negative emissions technologies and geoengineering deployed is mainly
dictated by these requirements.
The
IPCC report on 1.5°C will serve as a basis for the COP24
negotiations. These are intended to close the gap between the maximum
1.5°C decided in Paris and the 2.7-3.7°C projected on the basis of
current nationally determined contributions. But capitalists and
their political representatives have their foot on the brake: there
is no question for them of leaving fossils in the ground; there is no
question of breaking with neoliberalism, no question of food
sovereignty, no question of socializing the energy sector to plan the
fastest possible transition to a 100% renewable system, no question
of a truly just transition and climate justice. On the contrary:
there is a great risk that the highly hypothetical negative emissions
technologies will be used as a pretext to further weaken emission
reduction targets.
“Every
tonne of CO2 not emitted counts.” But who is counting, on the basis
of which social priorities, in the service of which needs, determined
by whom and how? For a quarter of a century now, the accounts have
been kept by capitalists and their governments, in defiance of true
democracy. The result is known: more inequality, more oppression and
exploitation, more environmental destruction, more land grabbing and
appropriation of resources by the rich... and a greater climate
threat than ever. It is high time to change the rules of the game.
A
strong global mobilization of environmental, trade union, peasant,
feminist and indigenous movements is necessary and urgent. It is no
longer enough to be outraged and put pressure on decision-makers. We
must rise up, build the convergence of struggles, take to the streets
by the millions and tens of millions, block fossil investments, land
grabbing and militarism, actively invest in supporting farmers, lay
the basis for social practices that are not determined by the
framework of capitalism…
The
climate issue is a major social issue. Only the exploited and the
oppressed are able to provide answers in accordance with their
interests. Ecosocialism or barbarism: this is the choice that is
becoming increasingly clear. Our planet, our lives, our lives, life
itself, are worth more than their profits!
>> The statement above was issued by the Ecology Commission of the Fourth International.
No comments:
Post a Comment