This September, the world erupted
when over 7
million people — young and old—poured into the streets
for the Global
Climate Strike. The mass action, which made a Green
New Deal a top demand, was sparked in the lead-up to
Sweden’s 2018 general election, when teen activist Greta Thunberg
began ditching school to protest Sweden’s inaction on climate
change. Greta, who was already inspiring more student strikes through
social media, catalyzed the Fridays
for Future movement when she decided to continue
striking on Fridays after the general election. Over the
past year, young leaders —particularly youth of color—have
been on the forefront of building Friday Climate Strikes into a
worldwide student civil disobedience movement, taking aim at the
political failure to address the climate emergency.
The logic of the Climate Strike
movement was summated
by Greta at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January
2019. “Some say that we should not engage in activism, instead we
should leave everything to our politicians and just vote for change
instead,” she said. “But what do we do when there is no political
will? What do we do when the politics needed are nowhere in sight?”
In other words, Climate Strikes are
happening for the same reason labor strikes often happen:
Negotiations have broken down. CEOs profiting from the exploitation
of workers and the
Earth are unwilling to cede to demands that would improve
the lives of those affected by their practices. And politicians
are unwilling to put the good of ordinary people first.
Like labor strikes, climate strikes
are premised on the principle that organizers won’t get what they
want just by asking: They have to create the political will for their
demands by causing disruption that is impossible to ignore. The use
of this tactic signals a shift away from the evidently floundering
strategies of online
petitions and behind-the-scenes
talks with key decision-makers.
However, labor strikes are more
likely than student strikes to be successful for a key reason:
Workers are strategically positioned to leverage their collective
power because labor strikes halt production and therefore
profit-making by employers, which forces their bosses to cede to
their demands or lose out. Unlike student strikes, worker strikes
cause direct economic impact, which affects what key decision-makers
care about most: profit-making and economic conditions that are
favorable for re-election. The pathway to victory for Climate
Strikers is building an international movement of people acting in
their capacity as workers to
disrupt the economy significantly enough that politicians are forced
to cave to the demand for a Green New Deal.
The challenge is to turn the
powerful movement for climate strikes into a movement capable of
organizing actual workers’ strikes.
Building towards labor
strikes
Teachers
have been on the forefront of the recent
strike wave, and the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA) may
have advanced the movement further when its members passed a
resolution stating “that
the MTA delegation to the 2019 NEA [National Education Association]
Representative Assembly propose a national teachers strike in support
of the Green New Deal.” Unfortunately, NEA delegates voted
down the proposal—but that doesn’t mean it’s the end.
One possible route forward comes
from Francisco Cendejas, a long-time labor organizer who helped start
National Union of Healthcare Workers (NUHW). He suggests that unions
could resolve to strike for a Green New Deal if a number of other
national unions agreed to do so as well. The simple explanation for
this “strike pact” approach is that there is safety in numbers,
but the reasoning goes deeper. The National Labor Relations Board
(NLRB) and U.S. labor laws overtly favor employers over
workers—and place strict parameters around striking. This
imbalance has created a mountain of legal barriers preventing an
entire union from going on strike—especially for a Green New Deal
or other demands for the common good.
However, there are no illegal
strikes, just unsuccessful ones. We make them "legal"
by winning our demands. West
Virginia teachers did this when they launched
a successful wildcat strike last year. If many large unions
with high-stakes disruptive power can agree to strike in solidarity
with each other and their communities, we could have the power to
win.
If you belong to a union, you can
start organizing support for Climate Strikes and a Green New Deal by
introducing a local union resolution in
support of each. Passing this resolution will further align the Labor
and Climate Movements, and could move your union toward endorsing
progressive climate candidates, collectively bargaining for green
contract provisions, and showing up to climate actions. Once you
pass a resolution in your local union, you can move toward passing a
similar resolution at higher levels, like city and county labor
councils.
Getting your union to support a
Green New Deal or Climate Strikes will not necessarily be
straightforward. Unions have different politics, different structures
for member participation, and some have been hostile toward
the Green New Deal. Additionally, many unions have settled for
operating in accordance to a “service model,” meaning they aim to
satisfy their members’ demands through handling grievances,
lobbying and securing benefits rather than direct pressure on
their employers—which diminishes the power a union could have
against threats to working class interests. Turning Climate Strikes
into a winning strategy will require turning unions into a fighting
force. For lessons in how to achieve this, we can examine the
successful tactics of Caucus of Rank-and-File Educators (CORE)
within the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU).
Towards social justice
unionism
When CORE members were elected as
CTU leaders in 2010, they forfeited CTU’s service model for a
social movement unionism approach,
which they first demonstrated
in a 2012 strike that centered on the improvement
of public education and forming alliances with parents and
students. The union's dedication to bargaining for the common good
was on full display during its recent strike, in which union
members won a
contract securing support staff for homeless students, a declaration
of Chicago schools as sanctuary spaces, a cap on class sizes, and a
nurse and social worker for every school.
CORE’s continued militancy and
success has spread to teachers’ unions around the country
through UCORE, including
MTA—the union that passedthe resolution to propose a general strike
for a Green New Deal. If workers organize their unions to follow
CORE’s approach of rank-and-file democracy, community alliances,
and using bargaining power to win demands for the common good, they
could build labor support for a Green New Deal and even align unions
around a "Climate Strike Pact."
If you are not part of a union, you
can gain inspiration from the 2006 “Day
Without an Immigrant” mass strike. Immigrants and solidarity
strikers were able to participate due to the protection of "concerted
activity" included in the National Labor Relations Act. Legal
protection of concerted activity allows union and non-union workers
to act collectively to improve the terms and conditions of their
work, which is something a Green New Deal could
do. With less than 12% of U.S. workers belonging to a union, this
protection holds particular importance. However, some employers might
still try to fire workers for participating, which means we would
need to mobilize workers and the broader community around protests,
public shaming and boycotts targeting the offending employers
until they cave and rehire the workers.
The bottom line is this: Climate
Strikes can win a Green New Deal by building community and Labor
alliances around demands for the common good. We can leverage our
power as workers through high-impact, disruptive labor strikes that
halt the economy’s gears until politicians can no longer ignore us,
and are forced to cede to demands that will save the world.
>> The article above was written by Sydney Ghazarian, and is reprinted from In These Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment